RandProofRandProof
Whitepaper

4. RandProof vs. Chainlink: The Comparison

Comparison notes (v0.57, per AV-148): Chainlink figures are as of June 2026, drawn from public Chainlink documentation and pricing pages, and are subj

DimensionChainlinkRandProof Network
Protocol layerVRF (pre-existing)PoFR™ (coined by Mauricio Artigas)
Product / artifactVRF responseRandProof (permanent proof)
Token required✅ LINKNone (USDC/native)
Chain support~15 (EVM-focused)17+ chains
Entropy Sources115 (DRAND Mainnet + Chain-Native VRF + Commit-Reveal + NIST + Block Timestamp + ETH RANDAO + BTC Merkle Root + Multi-Chain Hashes + ANU QRNG + Tor Consensus + BABE VRF + drand Quicknet + RandProofVRF + Autonomous Beacon + Epoch Entropy Pool) -- Phase 4 target, see Section 26
Redundancy❌ No15 independent sources, 7 entropy domains (at full Phase 4 deployment)
Public Beacons❌ 04 (DRAND Mainnet + drand Quicknet + NIST + ANU QRNG)
Chain-Native Entropy❌ NoYes
Time-Based Entropy❌ NoYes
Threshold securityDONBLS t-of-n + Mobile Nodes
Automation layerSeparate (extra LINK)Built-in (same fee)
Fee per request$0.25–$2.00 LINK$0.05–$0.25 USDC/native
Admin key on fulfill()✅ YesNo, immutable fulfillment path; assigner role timelocked 24h (Section 19)

Comparison notes (v0.57, per AV-148): Chainlink figures are as of June 2026, drawn from public Chainlink documentation and pricing pages, and are subject to change. RandProof entropy-source and redundancy figures are Phase 4 targets per Section 26; see Section 19.2.1 for the entropy scope of the current KeeperCoordinator MVP (four sources, not fifteen).